One of the most debated topics in the world, one that has driven relationships between lovers, families, friends apart! What is the truth in this topic? Which is better? Find out down below!

 Among all the controversies in the world, none are so vicious and debated as hard taco shell versus soft taco shell.

    Okay, obviously it is not as hot as a debate as pineapple pizza or gender inequality, but nonetheless, hard shell tacos versus soft shell tacos is one topic that places many people at odds with one another.

    However, despite some people’s claims that hard shell tacos are better than a soft shell, they are simply mistaken, since soft shell is the superior choice of wrapping for a taco.

    This is why.

    Firstly, hard shells taste okay. They are not amazing, they are not anything special. It is a corn tortilla in a horrible shape. They are a complete sham.

    Softshell tortillas are much more fun, as they are more pliable and easy to handle. They also have a better taste to them, and add more to the taco as a whole.

    Secondly, hard shell tacos can become stale. When they are stale, they are even more unpleasant to eat. There is also an unusual taste to them that is uncomfortable.

    It is comparable to eating stale chips. Maybe a bunch of toppings can make it better, but in the end, is it really worth it?

    On the other hand, soft shell tacos do not become stale. One does not have to worry about their weird tasting, tough taco if it is a soft, nice tortilla. Why sit through a stale tortilla when one can have a nice, non-stale tortilla.

    Thirdly, a hard taco shell does not do well when eaten as leftovers. Overnight in the fridge makes the taco lose a lot of its crunchy factor. It becomes a weird semi-soft shell that is not very fun to eat at all. It simply feels more… depressing.

    Does a soft shell taco suffer from having their outer layer being semi-soft?

    No, because it is already soft and so they never have to face the humiliation of losing the quality of their shell.

    Fourth, taco shells are delicate. They break so easily. An example is when someone gets tacos at a drive-through.

    If they get the hard shell tacos, then there is a possibility that they could be broken on the drive home. Either from accidental rough handling or some mishap, that person can open the bag to find their taco, broken. Sad.

    On the other hand, if someone gets a soft shell taco, then they do not have to worry about whether their taco will be broken or not, because it cannot be broken. It is too powerful.

    If these top reasons were not enough to sway people’s opinion, one also has to consider the fact that hard shell tacos cannot fit as much.

    The way the taco is shaped can cause things placed on top to fall off. It rolls down the slope of the taco and either falls on the table, falls on the tray, or even on someone’s lap. That is so depressing and annoying because it can easily get messy.

    Soft shell tacos would not play people like this. People whose condiments fall out of their soft shell tacos do not hold it properly, because it needs to be cradled, not manhandled.

    Of course, in the end, sometimes people cannot be swayed from their desires.

    Nonetheless, hopefully, this convinced some people of the correct taco shell, and if not, then that is saddening news, but understandable.

Kaycie Adams

This picture depicts the locker of a student who is in Humanities. 9 out of 17 of the books pictured here belong to the Humanities course for first semester. In contrast, the English 4 course has 3 novels that they read during 1 semester.

Senior year provides a scheduling dilemma for seniors who can’t decide between the two extremes of English classes.

     Senior year: a time for working hard and hardly working to prepare for college. Between choosing classes that you can easily handle, but also look appealing to colleges.

     To graduate high school, you are required to take 4 years of English classes. From freshman year to junior year, an option to take honors or higher level courses such as AP are offered.

     When you get to senior year, however, there are two options available at Mission Viejo High School: the Humanities course, and the college prep level, English 4 class. Unlike all previous years, a parent override can’t get you into the higher level classes.

     The Humanities class is a test-in only class unless you are enrolled in the International Baccalaureate program here at Mission Viejo High School. So now over half of the previous AP Literature students are now forced to go from an AP style course to a college prep level course, that often works at a slower pace.

     College prep level classes are great, and this article is not to shame those who take college prep level classes or display them as less than classes. However, in style and how the classes are run, it is very different than the AP style that a large number of students are used to.

     Mission Viejo High School is a school that is known for their strong academics and their AP and IB programs with a large portion of students participating in them, more than any other high school. Moving from a class that depended on preparing the whole year to take the test in May, students around the country all focused on the same exact concepts and used analysis of novels as tools to get them through the test at the end of the year.

     Sarah Smith is a senior here at Mission Viejo High School and states “I feel like I am wasting my time in a class where I am not being pushed to my greatest ability. And with going to college next year I want to be equipped with knowledge that will be helpful.”

     The lack of an Honors English 4 class not only impacts AP students who were placed in the regular English 4 class, but it also brings an issue for students who are joining Humanities simply because there is no other alternative. Abby Ross, a senior, claims that she took Humanities because “normal English is too easy and not fun.”

     This seems to be a common feeling among students. Daryan Ghaemi says, “I took Humanities because I was worried that I would be too bored in English 4, and I wanted colleges to see that I challenged myself as a senior.” Sophia Klueter agrees, saying “I felt that this class would prepare me for college better than English 4 would.”

     The consensus is that there are truly no middle grounds. It is not fair to expect students coming from the college prep classes to suddenly be at a higher level to keep the past AP kids interested, and it also isn’t fair to expect ex-AP kids to suddenly drop a level just because there isn’t a class offered to them at their level.

Madelyn Novick

During Aliso Niguel High School’s patriotic 9/11 game against Santa Ana High School, offensive actions were expressed by Aliso students, making many question if the game truly was patriotic or racist.

      Like many schools, Aliso Niguel High School has their own version of a patriotic football game. They have their students dress in red, white and blue and other patriotic clothing along with some spirit posters, what is considered usual for a football game.

    However, here is when things get dicey. Some of the posters referenced President Trump, and with his name comes the connotative meaning of anti-immigrant and more specifically, anti-Latino sentiments due to his idea of the border wall and the separation of families after targeting only illegal immigrants of color, leaving many children traumatized beyond repair.

    Now consider the following: 99% of Santa Ana High School is Latino. Also, note that posters carried by students from a 56% white populated school in conservative Southern Orange County had racist remarks such as “We Love White” and “Build the Wall.”

    Santa Ana’s principal, Jeff Bishop was also very frustrated at the treatment he saw his students get. They were welcomed with said racist posters and other chants from the student section, and every touchdown from Aliso’s team led to screams of “USA.”

    Instagram user jade_killz made their own post, in which they describe other events at the game, claiming that more parents and students reported hearing Aliso students that ICE should have been at the game to check the players’ citizenship papers and that the students were “cockroaches” and “disgusting immigrants.”

    Bishop, on that topic, said that they “…were not playing against Germany or Mexico. They were playing my kids, 22 minutes down the freeway.”

    After finding Aliso’s principle Deni Christensen and explaining what he had witnessed, she and her assistant principals set out to confiscate the posters and stop the chants whenever they were heard.

    After that, the game went back to being about the sport instead of promoting racial and political agendas. Bishop then posted about the experience online after the game, inciting people to claim that Aliso should have forfeited their win.

    The Monday after the game, September 10th, Christensen then posted her own rebuttal. She had a completely different perspective on the event.

    Christensen claimed that the game was only supposed to be patriotic, making the chants of “USA” appear valid, which is understandable under that pretense. She also claimed that no one on her staff witnessed overt racism, despite what the posters said.

    Christensen also claimed she was saddened by those calling her students and her school racist, as she did not see it that way. She still stands by her claim that it was all in the name of patriotism for the 9/11 memorial game.

    Her response has received lots of backlash, as many believe that her student’s actions were blatantly racist. She stated that it’s a matter of perception, which incited more backlash, as people are viewing it as a white woman deciding what is racist to a person of color.

    Christensen’s response conflicting with Bishop’s also adds more controversy, as it can be perceived as a defense against racist actions along with the toleration of it, which is also not appropriate from a school official.

    Kaycie Adams, the center editor of the Diablo Dispatch, had this to say: “I believe that as a principal, she should take charge of her school, realize the mistake they made, and apologize.”

    In regard to Aliso winning the game, many have called for them to forfeit the win due to the insults hurled at players, ruining any possibility of the win being fair or justified as they were being degraded while they were playing.